Current:Home > Contact'Violent rhetoric' targeting Colorado Supreme Court justices prompts FBI investigation -Horizon Finance School
'Violent rhetoric' targeting Colorado Supreme Court justices prompts FBI investigation
View
Date:2025-04-19 10:10:07
Officials are investigating threats on Colorado Supreme Court justices after their decision to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential primary election, according to reports from multiple outlets.
Online posts about violence toward the justices spread rapidly in the 24 hours after the decision was announced, according to an analysis by Advance Democracy and reported by NBC News.
The state Supreme Court decided Dec. 19 that Trump's actions leading up to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, meant that he "engaged in insurrection," disqualifying him from holding office because under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
“The FBI is aware of the situation and working with local law enforcement,” FBI spokesperson Vikki Migoya said in a statement emailed to multiple outlets. “We will vigorously pursue investigations of any threat or use of violence committed by someone who uses extremist views to justify their actions regardless of motivation.”
Migoya did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
According to CNN, the Denver Police Department responded to a justice's home Thursday after an apparent hoax report. A police spokesperson told Axios that the department is increasing patrols near justices' residences. Denver police did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
More:Supreme Court may want to avoid Trump. Colorado's ballot ruling won't let them
Report finds 'significant violent rhetoric' against justices after ruling
As first reported by NBC, public interest research nonprofit Advance Democracy found social media users posted "significant violent rhetoric" against justices and Democrats after the ruling.
"We are seeing significant violent language and threats being made against the Colorado justices and others perceived to be behind yesterday’s Colorado Supreme Court ruling," Advance Democracy president Daniel J. Jones told NBC. "The normalization of this type of violent rhetoric − and lack of remedial action by social media entities − is cause for significant concern."
A report issued by the organization and obtained by NBC outlined several messages posted on pro-Trump forums, extremist websites and Truth Social.
"What do you call 7 justices from the Colorado Supreme Court at the bottom of the ocean? A good start," one post in the report stated, according to NBC.
"Kill judges. Behead judges. Roundhouse kick a judge into the concrete," read another post.
The Colorado Judicial Branch did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
Colorado Supreme Court ruled to remove Trump from ballot over Jan. 6 actions
The Colorado high court's decision rests on justices' determination that Trump incited an insurrection when fomenting the crowd that caused a riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
"President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president," Colorado's high court wrote in an unsigned opinion. "Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the election code for the secretary to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot."
The state Supreme Court reversed a lower court's ruling, which ruled that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the president. The 14th Amendment was passed in the post-Civil War era and bans anyone who "engaged in insurrection" from holding office.
veryGood! (3282)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Microsoft says Chinese hackers breached email, including U.S. government agencies
- SAG-AFTRA agrees to contract extension with studios as negotiations continue
- Fracking Company to Pay for Public Water System in Rural Pennsylvania Town
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Melanie Griffith Covers Up Antonio Banderas Tattoo With Tribute to Dakota Johnson and Family
- How a New ‘Battery Data Genome’ Project Will Use Vast Amounts of Information to Build Better EVs
- What recession? Why stocks are surging despite warnings of doom and gloom
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Two Indicators: After Affirmative Action & why America overpays for subways
Ranking
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Temptation Island's New Gut-Wrenching Twist Has One Islander Freaking Out
- Indiana, Iowa, Ohio and Wisconsin Lag on Environmental Justice Issues
- Twitter vs. Threads, and why influencers could be the ultimate winners
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Twitter threatens to sue its new rival, Threads, claiming Meta stole trade secrets
- How Decades of Hard-Earned Protections and Restoration Reversed the Collapse of California’s Treasured Mono Lake
- Women are returning to the job market in droves, just when the U.S. needs them most
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Inside Clean Energy: A Dirty Scandal for a Clean Energy Leader
How Shein became a fast-fashion behemoth
SAG-AFTRA agrees to contract extension with studios as negotiations continue
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Tennis Star Naomi Osaka Gives Birth, Welcomes First Baby With Boyfriend Cordae
The EV Battery Boom Is Here, With Manufacturers Investing Billions in Midwest Factories
Inside Clean Energy: The Idea of 100 Percent Renewable Energy Is Once Again Having a Moment
Like
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- New Toolkit of Health Guidance Helps Patients and Care Providers on the Front Lines of Climate Change Prepare for Wildfires
- A Big Federal Grant Aims to Make Baltimore a Laboratory for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience